Evaluating a library
web site based on web standards and
user feedback
Patricia Higginbottom, Martha
Verchot, and Jack T. Smith, Jr.
Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences, University
of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Purpose: This paper will report on
the process used by one academic
health sciences library in evaluating
their web presence.
Setting/Participants/Resources: Exactly what is
the library's web avatar or "web presence?" This
has been the source of much discussion over the
past year. Beginning as one web page offering user
information and database updates, the library's
web presence has grown into multiple sites on different
servers of loosely linked pages each filling a
variety of purposes. Authored by individual staff
members, each group of pages reflects the library's
activities and information from their particular
work area and perspective. Integration between
the different websites has been minimal. One problem
quickly identified is that no particular person
or group has responsibility for coordinating the
content, style, or format of the information or
in assuring that different pages of the site remain
updated and current.
Brief Description: With the growth in the number
of electronic resources and increasing use of those
resources remotely, we determined it was time to
evaluate our web site based on accepted usability
standards and user testing. A web usability group
of library staff was formed to determine a process
for improvement. Data was gathered from books, articles
and classes on web usability. The first step has
been to conduct interviews with library staff and
users of the web site to determine such things as
what does the site need to include and what is its
purpose.
Results/Outcome: A web usability team is now in the
process of determining a process for solving these
issues and this paper will report on those processes
and the results. Our desired outcome is an easily
navigated, content-rich library website.
Evaluation Method: Evaluation methods include user
interviews, card sorting techniques and formal usability
testing. After changes to the site, the same techniques
will be used to reevaluate.
|